In his astoundingly stupid attack piece, Fecke says I 'published' Prof. Pieklo's course syllabus.

This is inaccurate: Prof. Pieklo--or Hamline--published it.

I make no apology for referring readers to relevant, on-point publicly-available information--and consider it absurd for Fecke to seek to stigmatize the discussion of publicly-available information.

In my blogpost I was asking Fecke to contact Prof. Pieklo--to condemn her for her irresponsible charge. The only reason I linked to Prof. Pieklo's syllabus was to provide Fecke with Pieklo's contact email address.

Fecke claims to see my inner motivation for linking to Pieklo's publication: To force her into a conversation with me against her will. (Huh?)

Prof. Pieklo has directed strong accusations against me: It is true that I believe people lobbing strong charges should defend them, that much is true, though I can't see how linking to her syllabus would matter--or constitute 'putting pressure' on Pieklo.

**

For clarity, my paragraphs above respond to Fecke's statement here:

But when you start publishing Jessica’s course syllabus online in an effort to force her into a conversation that you want to have — and that she has made clear that she doesn’t — you’re crossing the line from troll to stalker. That is, yes, misogynist, dear Gavin. (If you can’t understand why pointing out the employer of a woman is not just misogynist, but McCarthyite, my point is proven more.) And it makes you someone I have absolutely, positively no interest in ever hearing from or dealing with again.