asking Dr. Karen Terry:
'Data analyst' Margaret Smith has suggested [in Archbishop John Niensted's interpretation] that the report attributes causation for the high abuse incidence to the sexual revolution of the second half of the 20th Century in the USA. But I don't see this within the report itself. Did the researchers form some consensus justifying Margaret Smith's interpretation, or would they distance themselves from it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment